NEWS RELEASE
For Immediate Release Feb. 5, 2013 Contact: Yvonne "Bonnie" Ramirez, 
Director of Communications (512) 719-0710 Texas Animal Health Commission (TAHC) 
TAHC Continues Efforts to Eradicate Scrapie 
AUSTIN - The Texas Animal Health Commission (TAHC) continues to work with 
the Texas sheep and goat industries toward the eradication of Scrapie. Texas 
currently leads the nation in sheep and goat production. A common goal of the US 
Sheep Industry and the American Sheep Industry (ASI) is to eradicate Scrapie 
from the US borders by 2017. To help achieve this goal, the USDA is considering 
a proposed rule that would make the identification requirements for goats 
similar to those currently in place for sheep, as well as possibly expanding 
surveillance efforts for Scrapie in goats. Once the disease is eradicated, the 
US would then seek recognition as Scrapie-free in accordance with the World 
Organization for Animal Health. (OIE) 
Texas leads the nation in sheep and goats production. Since 2009, there 
have been no confirmed cases of Scrapie in Texas. The last big spike in Texas 
Scrapie cases was in 2006 with 9 infected herds. According to USDA regulations, 
Texas must conduct adequate Scrapie surveillance by a collecting a minimum of 
598 sheep samples annually. In 2012 there were 1,050 samples collected from 
animals with Texas tags. 
Dr. Dee Ellis, State Veterinarian, said, "Texas has made significant 
progress in battling this disease. The Scrapie Program has proven to be 
successful in Texas. Fighting this disease and implementing an animal 
identification program has worked." To date, Texas has 30 participating flocks 
enrolled in the Scrapie Flock Certification program. 
Nationally, in 2005, there was a peak in Scrapie numbers. In the last 
fiscal year, for the first time ever, there were more Scrapie field cases in 
goats than in sheep. In fiscal years 2008 and 2011, two significant Scrapie 
outbreaks occurred in goats involving a total of 18 positive goats. 
The National Scrapie Eradication Program continued to make excellent 
progress in fiscal year 2012. In FY 2012, the percent of cull sheep found 
positive at slaughter decreased. This measure of prevalence decreased 96.2 
percent since slaughter surveillance started in FY 2003 and 24.7 percent, 
respectively since FY 2011. Additionally, there was a 47% decrease in the number 
of infected and source flocks identified during FY 2012 compared to the previous 
fiscal year. 
Scrapie is a degenerative disease of the nervous system that falls into 
the category of Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathies (TSE). The disease is 
caused by a transmissible prion or abnormal protein which is very stable in the 
environment. Traditional blood tests are not reliable to diagnose Scrapie, so a 
sample is needed to diagnose it. Currently, no treatment exists for Scrapie. 
There is no known evidence of Scrapie transmission to humans. 
While animals of any age may be exposed to Scrapie, lambs and kids are at 
the greatest risk of contracting the disease and are often infected by their 
dams shortly after birth. 
Typically, infected animals don't show signs of Scrapie, such as behavioral 
changes, tremors, and incoordination that progresses to recumbency and death, 
until they are two years of age or older. 
The most effective method of Scrapie prevention is to maintain a closed 
flock. Raising replacement ewes, purchasing genetically resistant (RR) rams or 
buying from a certified-free Scrapie flock are other options to reduce the risk 
the Scrapie. At this time the resistant genetic markers in goats have not been 
identified, therefore it is important to maintain your sheep and goat herds 
separately. 
Since the incubation period for Scrapie is typically two to five years, 
producers should record individual identification numbers and the seller's 
premises identification number on purchase and sales records. These records must 
be maintained for a minimum of five years. "The success of the Scrapie 
Eradication Program is tied to producers keeping good records of sales and 
purchases," said Dr. Ellis. 
TAHC rules regulate official identification tags or a registration tattoo 
be applied to all sheep 18 months of age and older, all breeding sheep, all 
breeding goats except those commingled with other sheep, and all sexually intact 
show or exhibition animals. 
Producers should notify the Texas Animal Health Commission (800-550-8242) 
or the USDA-Austin Office (512-383-2400) if they have a sheep or goat over 18 
months with neurologic signs such as incoordination, behavioral changes, or 
intense itching with wool loss. Producers may order Scrapie identification tags 
by calling 866-873-2824. For more information, please visit our web site at 
www.tahc.texas.gov or give us a call. 
The Texas Animal Health Commission (TAHC) is one of the oldest state 
regulatory agencies. TAHC was founded by the legislature in 1893 with a mission 
to combat fever ticks that plagued the Texas Cattle Industry. Today, the agency 
works to protect the health of all Texas livestock including: cattle, equine, 
sheep, goats, swine, poultry, exotic livestock and fowl. 
CORRECTION TO FEB. 5 NEWS RELEASE 
For Immediate Release
Feb. 8, 2013 Contact: Yvonne "Bonnie" Ramirez, Director of Communications (512) 719-0710 Texas 
Animal Health Commission (TAHC) TAHC Continues Efforts to Eradicate Scrapie 
Below is a REVISED Scrapie News Release. This news release replaces the previous one that was emailed on Feb. 5, 2013. 
The corrected content/information can be found in the third to the last paragraph of the news release in bold and italicized font. 
We apologize for the confusion. 
AUSTIN - The Texas Animal Health Commission (TAHC) continues to work with the Texas sheep and goat industries toward the eradication of Scrapie. Texas currently leads the nation in sheep and goat production. A common goal of the US Sheep Industry and the American Sheep Industry (ASI) is to eradicate Scrapie from the US borders by 2017. To help achieve this goal, the USDA is considering a proposed rule that would make the identification requirements for goats similar to those currently in place for sheep, as well as possibly expanding surveillance efforts for Scrapie in goats. Once the disease is eradicated, the US would then seek recognition as Scrapie-free in accordance with the World Organization for Animal Health. (OIE) 
Texas leads the nation in sheep and goats production. Since 2009, there have been no confirmed cases of Scrapie in Texas. The last big spike in Texas Scrapie cases was in 2006 with 9 infected herds. According to USDA regulations, Texas must conduct adequate Scrapie surveillance by a collecting a minimum of 598 sheep samples annually. In 2012 there were 1,050 samples collected from animals with Texas tags. 
Dr. Dee Ellis, State Veterinarian, said, "Texas has made significant progress in battling this disease. The Scrapie Program has proven to be successful in Texas. Fighting this disease and implementing an animal identification program has worked." To date, Texas has 30 participating flocks enrolled in the Scrapie Flock Certification program. 
Nationally, in 2005, there was a peak in Scrapie numbers. In the last fiscal year, for the first time ever, there were more Scrapie field cases in goats than in sheep. In fiscal years 2008 and 2011, two significant Scrapie outbreaks occurred in goats involving a total of 18 positive goats. 
The National Scrapie Eradication Program continued to make excellent progress in fiscal year 2012. In FY 2012, the percent of cull sheep found positive at slaughter decreased. This measure of prevalence decreased 96.2 percent since slaughter surveillance started in FY 2003 and 24.7 percent, respectively since FY 2011. Additionally, there was a 47% decrease in the number of infected and source flocks identified during FY 2012 compared to the previous fiscal year. 
Scrapie is a degenerative disease of the nervous system that falls into the category of Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathies (TSE). The disease is caused by a transmissible prion or abnormal protein which is very stable in the environment. Traditional blood tests are not reliable to diagnose Scrapie, so a tissue sample is needed to diagnose it. Currently, no treatment exists for Scrapie. There is no known evidence of Scrapie transmission to humans. 
While animals of any age may be exposed to Scrapie, lambs and kids are at the greatest risk of contracting the disease and are often infected by their dams shortly after birth. Typically, infected animals don't show signs of Scrapie, such as behavioral changes, tremors, and incoordination that progresses to recumbency and death, until they are two years of age or older. 
The most effective method of Scrapie prevention is to maintain a closed flock. Raising replacement ewes, purchasing genetically resistant (RR) rams or buying from a certified-free Scrapie flock are other options to reduce the risk the Scrapie. At this time the resistant genetic markers in goats have not been identified, therefore it is important to maintain your sheep and goat herds separately. 
Since the incubation period for Scrapie is typically two to five years, producers should record individual identification numbers and the seller's premises identification number on purchase and sales records. These records must be maintained for a minimum of five years. "The success of the Scrapie Eradication Program is tied to producers keeping good records of sales and purchases," said Dr. Ellis. 
TAHC rules require that official identification tags or a registration tattoo be applied to: 
* All sheep 18 months of age and older 
* All breeding sheep 
* All breeding goats (except for commercial goats that have no contact with sheep) 
* All sexually intact show or exhibition animals 
Producers should notify the Texas Animal Health Commission (800-550-8242) or the USDA-Austin Office (512-383-2400) if they have an adult sheep or goat with neurologic signs such as incoordination, behavioral changes, or intense itching with wool loss. Producers may order Scrapie identification tags by calling 866-873-2824. For more information, please visit our web site at 
www.tahc.state.tx.us 
The Texas Animal Health Commission (TAHC) is one of the oldest state regulatory agencies. TAHC was founded by the legislature in 1893 with a mission to combat fever ticks that plagued the Texas Cattle Industry. Today, the agency works to protect the health of all Texas livestock including: cattle, equine, sheep, goats, swine, poultry, exotic livestock and fowl. 
http://campaign.r20.constantcontact.com/render?llr=kpzk9zgab&v=001FbEh9Xz0N4LL62OOLkCF3kt133fvSY19OWWYJ7uYJg7QkaGN1kfsqUgYZI1TdSRiu6vKy7pdIxGWPANjEs0kfAC-Oywq2c1fM8ruOaAUKegfYrh_BNk0vw%3D%3D 
 
 
 
 
2002
Subject: TEXAS FINDS FOUR SCRAPIE INFECTED FLOCKS IN 15 MONTHS (3 herd 
flocks outside Texas) 
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 08:05:52 –0700 
From: "Terry S. Singeltary Sr." 
######## Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy #########
August 1 signaled the deadline for sheep, as well as many goats, to be 
identified with an ear tag approved by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) 
when the animals are moved from the farm for exhibition or sale. The ear tag is 
imprinted with a ranch identification number, which makes it possible to trace 
the animal back to the farm where it was born, in case scrapie infection is 
detected later in the animal. The identification tags, combined with accurate 
record keeping, are key elements of the national program to eradicate scrapie, 
the fatal, degenerative disease that can affect the brains of sheep and, 
sometimes, goats.
"In November 2001, USDA introduced a new national scrapie eradication 
program at the request of the American Sheep Industry Association. Since then, 
we've been in a 'grace period,' while producers obtained ear tag supplies and 
became familiar with the regulations," said Dr. Linda Logan, Texas' state 
veterinarian and head of the Texas Animal Health Commission (TAHC), the state's 
livestock health regulatory agency. "August 1 signaled the end of this 'phase-in 
period,' and the deadline for identification tags to be applied to sheep and 
many goats before they are sold or commingled with those from other 
farms."
"During the past eight months, more than 9,300 Texas ranchers have called 
the TAHC for a premise, or ranch identification number. This number is printed 
on the rancher's supply of the metal or plastic ear tags provided at no cost by 
the USDA," said Dr. Logan. "The back side of the tag is imprinted with an 
individual animal number, so ranchers may keep detailed records on each sheep or 
goat, if they wish."
Scrapie regulations require the following animals to have the official ear 
tag before they are sold or are exhibited: * all breeding sheep, regardless of 
age * all sheep 18 months of age or older
* all breeding goats and goats over 18 months of age, except low-risk 
goats. Low-risk goats are goats that have not been commingled with sheep, except 
low-risk (white-faced) commercial sheep. * sexually intact sheep or goats for 
show or exhibition. (Sexually intact animals are animals that have not been 
neutered.) * any sheep or goats that are considered to be at high risk, exposed 
to or positive for scrapie
"In lieu of an ear tag, a tattoo can be used as identification for 
registered meat or dairy show goats, as long as the animals move with their 
registration papers," explained veterinarian Terry Conger, TAHC's state 
epidemiologist. A premise identification ear tag is to be placed on the animal 
when it moves to slaughter, or if it sold without registration papers, he 
said.
"Wethers, which are neutered sheep, do not have to be tagged prior to an 
exhibition or a sale. Furthermore, commercial goats that haven't had any contact 
with sheep, don't have to be tagged for sale," explained Dr. Conger. "Commercial 
goats are those that are raised or bred for meat or fiber production and are not 
used for exhibition and are not registered with a breed association."
"Ranchers who haven't obtained a premise number and ear tags can still sell 
their animals," explained Dr. Logan. "Animals can be tagged by livestock market 
personnel, who may charge a small fee, to cover costs for ear tag application 
and for the required record keeping."
Dr. Conger also said slaughter house operators, agricultural science 
teachers, veterinarians or agricultural extension agents likewise may apply tags 
for producers. However, he encouraged producers to get their own premise 
identification number and tags by calling the TAHC's 'tag line' at 
1-866-873-2824. There's no charge for the call, premise number or tags, he 
said.
The TAHC has operated under the USDA scrapie regulations since November 
2001, while state regulations were developed to support the national program, 
said Dr. Logan. "We've worked closely with the sheep and goat industry in Texas 
to ensure Texas scrapie regulations reflect the federal rules. All states must 
meet or exceed these national standards," said Dr. Logan. "On Tuesday, July 30, 
the 12 TAHC commissioners adopted Texas scrapie regulations, and these will go 
into effect September 1." In the meantime, she said the TAHC will continue to 
operate under the national regulations.
Key elements of Texas' scrapie regulations for animal identification and 
movement requirements include:
* Tagging of eligible animals prior to in-state or interstate movement or 
exhibitions.
* Maintaining records for five years. Ranchers, markets, terminal feedlots, 
or persons
providing tags must keep records that include: -- date, number and species 
of animals tagged, bought or sold.
-- name and address of the person or market from which the animals were 
obtained or sold.
-- agents, such as agricultural science teachers or livestock markets, who 
supply ear tags, must maintain records that include the animal owner's name, 
address and the premise identification number for each animal.
All sheep and goats transported into Texas from other states must have had 
a certificate of veterinary inspection issued within the previous 30 days by a 
USDA-accredited private veterinary practitioner. Information to be included on 
the inspection document:
-- date inspection was made
-- number, species and gender of the animals -- reason for transport 
(exhibition, breeding purposes, feeding or slaughter) -- name and address of 
both the consignor and the recipient of the animals -- statement by the issuing 
veterinarian that the animals were not exhibiting clinical signs indicative of 
scrapie or any other infectious disease. The veterinarian must attest that the 
animals are not from a scrapie-infected, high-risk or exposed flock. -- all 
breeding or exhibition sheep and goats must be identified with an official ear 
tag, with the premise identification number recorded on the certificate of 
veterinary inspection.
-- sheep and goats entering Texas for feeding and/or slaughter also must 
meet the tagging and information record keeping requirements. The only exemption 
applies to feeder and/or slaughter sheep younger than 18 months and goats that 
have not been commingled with sheep.
"In lieu of an ear tag, tattooed registered goats can enter Texas with 
their registration papers," explained Dr. Conger. "As always, the TAHC also will 
continue to require that breeding rams older than 6 months of age enter Texas 
with a negative test for brucellosis within 30 days prior to shipment. The 
brucellosis test results must be written on the certificate of veterinary 
inspection.
"Scrapie has been difficult to eradicate since it was first introduced into 
the U.S. in l947, because the disease develops slowly and, for months, the signs 
of illness aren't obvious. Although older animals can be exposed and develop 
infection, lambs and kids in the flock are most susceptible to the scrapie 
agent, called a prion protein," said Dr. Conger. "Infected ewes shed the prion 
in tissue and fluids associated with birthing and can expose many flockmates 
during the lambing season."
"It can take as long as 18 months for the disease to become noticeable in 
infected animals. Clinical signs include weight loss, lip smacking, tremors, 
loss of coordination, swaying or wool pulling," said Dr. Logan. "Also, until 
recently, there was no approved live animal test to confirm the visual 
diagnosis, because brain tissue was needed for laboratory confirmation. Now 
scrapie disease surveillance can be conducted with 'third eyelid testing.' In 
this procedure, anesthetic drops are placed in the animal's eye, and a tiny 
snippet of tissue is collected from underneath the eyelid. The tissue is then 
prepared for shipment to a diagnostic laboratory for testing. Gene testing can 
also identify animals that are naturally susceptible or resistant to the 
disease, too."
"If an animal on the farm or at the market shows clinical signs indicative 
of scrapie, TAHC regulations require that the animal be moved only under a 
restricted movement permit issued by the TAHC or a USDA representative," 
commented Dr. Logan. "Movement will be restricted to a site where the animal 
will be destroyed, tested and disposed of properly. When it is appropriate, the 
animal may be moved back to the flock of origin, where it will be held under 
restriction, while a diagnosis is made. If sick sheep or goats are identified at 
a slaughter plant, they will be condemned and removed from the food chain. 
Samples will be collected from the animals for diagnosis."
As part of the national eradication effort, the USDA is conducting routine, 
random scrapie testing across the country. In Texas each week, the federal 
agency purchases about 150 sheep and goats destined for slaughter. "Brain tissue 
is collected from each of the animals and forwarded to the National Veterinary 
Services Laboratory in Ames, Iowa," said Dr. Conger. "As of August 1, scrapie 
has not been detected in these 'randomly sampled' animals. Within a few months, 
results of this 'blind study' will be reported on a state-by-state basis, but 
cases will not be identified to a flock."
"We have, however, detected four infected Texas flocks during the past 15 
months. In three herds, infection was found in flocks outside of Texas, and we 
traced animal movement to Texas. The infected flocks were found in Indiana, 
Oklahoma and California. We found the fourth flock by tracing movement out of 
one of the infected Texas flocks. Tracing disease movement is much like putting 
the pieces of the puzzle together until they fit," said Dr. Conger. "Of the four 
infected flocks in Texas, one has been depopulated and one is in a 
quarantine-monitoring program. Two of the flocks were recently disclosed as 
infected and flock management is still being decided."
"When scrapie infection is detected, we launch an epidemiological 
investigation to determine if the disease has been introduced into other 
flocks," said Dr. Conger. "The required ear tags and records will allow us to do 
a more thorough job in tracing an infected animal's movement from birth. This 
tracing is essential, if we are to eradicate scrapie."
Dr. Conger said the true prevalence of scrapie in the U.S. is not known, 
but only two countries are known to be free of the disease--Australia and New 
Zealand. The American Sheep Industry Association (ASI) in l998, declared scrapie 
as an important trade issue, estimating that the disease costs American farmers 
nearly $20 million yearly in lost export sales, extra disposal costs for dead 
sheep and lost productivity. Animal health officials and the sheep industry say 
scrapie can be eliminated in the U.S. by 2010. Disease eradication would be 
especially helpful to Texas producers, as the state ranks first in the nation 
for sheep and goat production, with more than 2.5 million head, according to the 
Texas Agricultural Statistics Service (TASS).
For more information regarding scrapie regulations, voluntary scrapie flock 
certification or to report clinical signs of the disease, contact the TAHC at 
1-800-550-8242.
TSS
2013 
TSE Policy
Test sheep peripheral tissues from animals infected with BSE and 
scrapie.
A workshop of international TSE experts held at Defra concluded that it is 
important to understand more about the possibility of mixed TSE infections in 
ruminants that could theoretically enter the food chain. Sheep or goats infected 
with both scrapie and BSE entering the food chain in the UK would risk further 
cases of vCJD. Little is known about the pathogenesis and therefore the human 
risk from such a mixed infection. Some experimental infections of sheep with a 
mixture of BSE and scrapie have been completed and the brains have been 
analysed. Brains are not consumed, but the peripheral tissues are. The aim of 
this project would be to analyse the peripheral tissues collected and archived 
in these experiments for the presence of BSE. 
Oral transmission of L-type BSE to small ruminants 
Oral transmissions use established methods. This project will demonstrate 
whether atypical L-type BSE (a disease that current evidence suggests may 
transmit to humans) can be acquired in small ruminants (SR) through feed and the 
environment. Tissues which would enter the food chain will be sampled at post 
mortem from animals of the appropriate age and tested for abnormal 
prion/infectivity 
2012 atypical L-type BSE BASE California reports 
Saturday, August 4, 2012 
*** Final Feed Investigation Summary - California BSE Case - July 2012 
SUMMARY REPORT CALIFORNIA BOVINE SPONGIFORM ENCEPHALOPATHY CASE 
INVESTIGATION JULY 2012 
Summary Report BSE 2012 
Executive Summary 
Saturday, August 4, 2012 
Update from APHIS Regarding Release of the Final Report on the BSE 
Epidemiological Investigation 
Sunday, August 26, 2012
Susceptibility of young sheep to oral infection with bovine spongiform 
encephalopathy decreases significantly after weaning 
Wednesday, January 18, 2012
BSE IN GOATS CAN BE MISTAKEN FOR SCRAPIE 
February 1, 2012 
The Limits of Test-Based Scrapie Eradication Programs in Goats 
Fabien Corbière, Affiliation: UMR 1225 INRA-ENVT Interactions Hôtes Agents 
Pathogènes, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire, Toulouse, France 
X Cécile Chauvineau-Perrin, Affiliation: ANSES, Laboratoire d’études et 
recherches caprines, Niort, France 
X Caroline Lacroux, Affiliation: UMR 1225 INRA-ENVT Interactions Hôtes 
Agents Pathogènes, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire, Toulouse, France 
X Séverine Lugan, Affiliation: UMR 1225 INRA-ENVT Interactions Hôtes Agents 
Pathogènes, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire, Toulouse, France 
X Pierrette Costes, Affiliation: UMR 1225 INRA-ENVT Interactions Hôtes 
Agents Pathogènes, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire, Toulouse, France 
X Myriam Thomas, Affiliation: ANSES, Laboratoire d’études et recherches 
caprines, Niort, France 
X Isabelle Brémaud, Affiliation: ANSES, Laboratoire d’études et recherches 
caprines, Niort, France 
X Christophe Chartier, Affiliation: ANSES, Laboratoire d’études et 
recherches caprines, Niort, France 
X Francis Barillet, Affiliation: INRA, UR 631, Station d’Amélioration 
Génétique des Animaux, Castanet-Tolosan, France 
X François Schelcher, Affiliation: UMR 1225 INRA-ENVT Interactions Hôtes 
Agents Pathogènes, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire, Toulouse, France 
X Olivier Andréoletti mail
Abstract 
Small ruminant post-mortem testing programs were initially designed for 
monitoring the prevalence of prion disease. They are now considered as a 
potential alternative to genetic selection for eradicating/controlling classical 
scrapie at population level. If such policy should be implemented, its success 
would be crucially dependent on the efficiency of the surveillance system used 
to identify infected flocks. In this study, we first determined the performance 
of post-mortem classical scrapie detection in eight naturally affected goat 
herds (total n = 1961 animals) according to the age at culling. These results 
provided us with necessary parameters to estimate, through a Monte Carlo 
simulation model, the performance of scrapie detection in a commercial 
population. According to this model, whatever the number of tests performed, 
post mortem surveillance will have limited success in identifying infected 
herds. These data support the contention that scrapie eradication programs 
relying solely on post mortem testing in goats will probably fail. Considering 
the epidemiological and pathological similarities of scrapie in sheep and goats, 
the efficiency of scrapie surveillance in both species is likely to be similar. 
Citation: Corbière F, Chauvineau-Perrin C, Lacroux C, Lugan S, Costes P, et 
al. (2013) The Limits of Test-Based Scrapie Eradication Programs in Goats. PLoS 
ONE 8(1): e54911. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0054911
Editor: Jason Bartz, Creighton University, United States of America 
Received: September 17, 2012; Accepted: December 19, 2012; Published: 
January 23, 2013
Copyright: © 2013 Corbière et al. This is an open-access article 
distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which 
permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided 
the original author and source are credited.
Funding: This work was funded by GIS PRION grant 31B06134, by INRA grant 
AIP P00297, by the Poitou-Charentes region grants 04/RPC-A-103 and 05/RPC-A-13, 
by the EU FP7 ‘Goat BSE’ project CT-2006-36353 and EMIDA 2012 ‘Goat TSE free’ 
project. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, 
decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests 
exist.
* E-mail: o.andreoletti@envt.fr 
snip... 
Discussion 
Our study involved a relatively large number of classical scrapie cases (n 
= 183) recruited from eight naturally infected herds. It therefore provided a 
solid basis for assessing the performances of the TSE tests and/or choice of 
target tissue for classical scrapie detection in goats. However, like all 
previous studies focusing on the performance of PrPSc based TSE detection assay, 
this approach suffers from an intrinsic pitfall, i.e. the absence of a 
gold-standard that would provide a definitive TSE status for each individual. 
Currently, only bioassay (with no species barrier) could be considered as a 
pertinent tool to establish/exclude TSE agent presence in a sample. However, 
considering the number of samples that should be tested in an experiment like 
this one, systematic bioassay testing of each tissue is not feasible. In that 
context, we cannot exclude that some of the animals involved in this study might 
have been inaccurately considered to be TSE negative. 
Since their implementation in the EU and in North America, the rationale of 
TSE active surveillance systems in small ruminants has been debated; the number 
and age of tested animals, the choice of TSE screening tests and the choice of 
testing on posterior brainstem have been extensively discussed [10]. As 
anticipated from knowledge related to classical scrapie pathogenesis in small 
ruminants (late neuro-invasion during the incubation phase), our results 
demonstrate that the detection of TSE infected individuals would be 
significantly improved by using tonsil or mesenteric lymph node rather than 
posterior brainstem for PrPSc testing [7], [18]. The high concordance of the 
results obtained using a rapid PrPSc detection assay (Biorad TeSeE sheep/goat®) 
and a reference OIE confirmatory method (IHC) indicates that there is no 
technical limitation for developing a field TSE surveillance program based on 
PrPSc testing in lymphoid tissues. 
At the population level, whatever the testing scenario (number of tests 
performed each year) the results of our simulation study also indicated that TSE 
active surveillance strategies based on PrPSc testing on tonsil rather than on 
posterior brainstem would allow the detection of a higher number of classical 
scrapie infected herds. However, the performance gain (between 2% and 10% of 
additional scrapie infected herd detected) would remain relatively limited and 
whatever the testing regimen the system would fail to detect 100% of the 
infected herds. 
In addition, it must be considered that in a large number of countries, 
small ruminant TSE surveillance programs intend to monitor the prevalence of 
both classical and atypical scrapie [6], [19]. The lack of detectable PrPSc in 
the peripheral tissue of atypical scrapie infected individuals precludes the use 
of lymphoid tissues for atypical scrapie surveillance [5]. 
Therefore, considering the current limits of TSE detection tests, and under 
the hypothesis that the sole objective of TSE surveillance programs is to 
provide a global picture of TSE prevalence in the small ruminants populations 
the use of posterior brainstem for PrPSc remains the best compromise for TSE 
monitoring in field. 
Over the last decade, the EU policy for long term TSE control and 
eradication in small ruminants has relied on the identification of infected 
herds and the selection of genetically resistant animals in both infected flocks 
and in the general population [20]. In sheep, the ARR PRP allele provides a 
strong but not absolute resistance to classical scrapie and BSE agent [21], 
[22]. The recent identification of PrP polymorphisms in goats that might provide 
a strong, if not absolute, resistance to TSE agent infection could also provide 
opportunities for genetic selection in that species [23]–[26]. The selection of 
the ARR allele is an efficient tool for disease control/eradication in classical 
scrapie infected flocks [20]. However, the sustainability of genetic selection 
to control and eradicate TSE in small ruminants is still disputed. The existence 
of TSE agents (like atypical scrapie) that can develop in ARR homozygote sheep 
and the potential loss of genetic variability in animal populations are the two 
main arguments used by people arguing against genetic selection. Eradication 
policy based on the post mortem PrPSc testing and the stamping out of infected 
herds/flocks, without genetic selection is therefore still given consideration 
as an alternative to breeding for resistance. Our results clearly demonstrate 
that over a year the random testing of 20 000 individuals in an 850 000 
individuals population only allow the identification of a very limited 
proportion (12%) of infected herds. 
The simulation models that we developed rely on the French goat population 
and breeding system. They cannot be directly inferred to scrapie surveillance in 
sheep. However all the critical parameters that were used for modelling scrapie 
in the goat population were similar to those reported in sheep. The age 
distribution of cases that we used in goat was comparable to the one described 
in susceptible PrP genotype sheep [27], [28]. The age at which PrPSc become 
detectable in the posterior brainstem in goat (as reported here) and in 
naturally scrapie infected ARQ/ARQ sheep were also comparable [15]. In addition, 
the estimates obtained with our model are consistent with those reported by Hopp 
et al. [29] when assessing the performance of TSE active surveillance in the 
Norwegian sheep population. Therefore, it is our opinion that the results 
obtained in this study are also pertinent for estimating the likely performances 
of the post mortem scrapie surveillance program in sheep. 
TSE in small ruminants is mainly considered as an animal health issue. 
However, the uncertainties related to the capacity of other ruminant prions to 
cross species barriers [30] remain a concern for public health. Considering the 
results of our study and the capacity of TSE agents to persist in the 
environment, it can be concluded that a classical scrapie eradication policy 
that would solely rely on currently available TSE screening tests is unlikely to 
succeed. 
Supporting Information
snip...see full text ; 
Tuesday, November 02, 2010 
IN CONFIDENCE 
The information contained herein should not be disseminated further except 
on the basis of "NEED TO KNOW". 
BSE - ATYPICAL LESION DISTRIBUTION (RBSE 92-21367) statutory (obex only) 
diagnostic criteria CVL 1992 
2009 UPDATE ON ALABAMA AND TEXAS MAD COWS 2005 and 2006 
Wednesday, January 18, 2012 
Selection of Distinct Strain Phenotypes in Mice Infected by Ovine Natural 
Scrapie Isolates Similar to CH1641 Experimental Scrapie 
Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology: February 2012 - 
Volume 71 - Issue 2 - p 140–147 
Wednesday, February 16, 2011 
IN CONFIDENCE 
SCRAPIE TRANSMISSION TO CHIMPANZEES 
IN CONFIDENCE 
Sunday, December 12, 2010 
EFSA reviews BSE/TSE infectivity in small ruminant tissues News Story 2 
December 2010 
Sunday, April 18, 2010 
SCRAPIE AND ATYPICAL SCRAPIE TRANSMISSION STUDIES A REVIEW 2010 
Thursday, December 23, 2010 
Molecular Typing of Protease-Resistant Prion Protein in Transmissible 
Spongiform Encephalopathies of Small Ruminants, France, 2002-2009 
Volume 17, Number 1 January 2011 
Thursday, November 18, 2010 
Increased susceptibility of human-PrP transgenic mice to bovine spongiform 
encephalopathy following passage in sheep 
Monday, April 25, 2011 
Experimental Oral Transmission of Atypical Scrapie to Sheep 
Volume 17, Number 5-May 2011 
Friday, February 11, 2011
Atypical/Nor98 Scrapie Infectivity in Sheep Peripheral Tissues 
Thursday, March 29, 2012 
atypical Nor-98 Scrapie has spread from coast to coast in the USA 2012 
NIAA Annual Conference April 11-14, 2011San Antonio, Texas 
Wednesday, April 4, 2012
20120402 - Breach of quarantine/Violation de la mise en quarantaine of an 
ongoing Scrapie investigation
Michigan and California have had a high spike in Goat Scrapie cases, 
compared to elsewhere ??? 
Tuesday, February 01, 2011 
Sparse PrP-Sc accumulation in the placentas of goats with naturally 
acquired scrapie 
(Figure 6) including five goat cases in FY 2008 that originated from the 
same herd in Michigan. This is highly unusual for goats, and I strenuously urge 
that there should be an independent investigation into finding the common 
denominator for these 5 goats in the same herd in Michigan with Scrapie. ... 
Thursday, February 23, 2012
Atypical Scrapie NOR-98 confirmed Alberta Canada sheep January 2012 
RESEARCH 
Emerging Infectious Diseases • www.cdc.gov/eid • Vol. 17, No. 5, May 2011 
Experimental Oral Transmission of Atypical Scrapie to Sheep 
Marion M. Simmons, S. Jo Moore,1 Timm Konold, Lisa Thurston, Linda A. 
Terry, Leigh Thorne, Richard Lockey, Chris Vickery, Stephen A.C. Hawkins, 
Melanie J. Chaplin, and John Spiropoulos 
To investigate the possibility of oral transmission of atypical scrapie in 
sheep and determine the distribution of infectivity in the animals’ peripheral 
tissues, we challenged neonatal lambs orally with atypical scrapie; they were 
then killed at 12 or 24 months. Screening test results were negative for 
disease-specifi c prion protein in all but 2 recipients; they had positive 
results for examination of brain, but negative for peripheral tissues. 
Infectivity of brain, distal ileum, and spleen from all animals was assessed in 
mouse bioassays; positive results were obtained from tissues that had negative 
results on screening. These fi ndings demonstrate that atypical scrapie can be 
transmitted orally and indicate that it has the potential for natural 
transmission and iatrogenic spread through animal feed. Detection of infectivity 
in tissues negative by current surveillance methods indicates that diagnostic 
sensitivity is suboptimal for atypical scrapie, and potentially infectious 
material may be able to pass into the human food chain. 
SNIP... 
Although we do not have epidemiologic evidence that supports the effi cient 
spread of disease in the fi eld, these data imply that disease is potentially 
transmissible under fi eld situations and that spread through animal feed may be 
possible if the current feed restrictions were to be relaxed. Additionally, 
almost no data are available on the potential for atypical scrapie to transmit 
to other food animal species, certainly by the oral route. However, work with 
transgenic mice has demonstrated the potential susceptibility of pigs, with the 
disturbing fi nding that the biochemical properties of the resulting PrPSc have 
changed on transmission (40). The implications of this observation for 
subsequent transmission and host target range are currently unknown. 
How reassuring is this absence of detectable PrPSc from a public health 
perspective? The bioassays performed in this study are not titrations, so the 
infectious load of the positive gut tissues cannot be quantifi ed, although 
infectivity has been shown unequivocally. No experimental data are currently 
available on the zoonotic potential of atypical scrapie, either through 
experimental challenge of humanized mice or any meaningful epidemiologic 
correlation with human forms of TSE. However, the detection of infectivity in 
the distal ileum of animals as young as 12 months, in which all the tissues 
tested were negative for PrPSc by the currently available screening and confi 
rmatory diagnostic tests, indicates that the diagnostic sensitivity of current 
surveillance methods is suboptimal for detecting atypical scrapie and that 
potentially infectious material may be able to pass into the human food chain 
undetected. 
Emerging Infectious Diseases • www.cdc.gov/eid • Vol. 17, No. 5, May 2011 
why do we not want to do TSE transmission studies on chimpanzees $ 
5. A positive result from a chimpanzee challenged severly would likely 
create alarm in some circles even if the result could not be interpreted for 
man. I have a view that all these agents could be transmitted provided a large 
enough dose by appropriate routes was given and the animals kept long enough. 
Until the mechanisms of the species barrier are more clearly understood it might 
be best to retain that hypothesis. 
snip... 
R. BRADLEY 
1: J Infect Dis 1980 Aug;142(2):205-8
Oral transmission of kuru, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, and scrapie to 
nonhuman primates.
Gibbs CJ Jr, Amyx HL, Bacote A, Masters CL, Gajdusek DC.
Kuru and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease of humans and scrapie disease of sheep 
and goats were transmitted to squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus) that were 
exposed to the infectious agents only by their nonforced consumption of known 
infectious tissues. The asymptomatic incubation period in the one monkey exposed 
to the virus of kuru was 36 months; that in the two monkeys exposed to the virus 
of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease was 23 and 27 months, respectively; and that in the 
two monkeys exposed to the virus of scrapie was 25 and 32 months, respectively. 
Careful physical examination of the buccal cavities of all of the monkeys failed 
to reveal signs or oral lesions. One additional monkey similarly exposed to kuru 
has remained asymptomatic during the 39 months that it has been under 
observation. 
snip... 
The successful transmission of kuru, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, and scrapie 
by natural feeding to squirrel monkeys that we have reported provides further 
grounds for concern that scrapie-infected meat may occasionally give rise in 
humans to Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.
PMID: 6997404 
Recently the question has again been brought up as to whether scrapie is 
transmissible to man. This has followed reports that the disease has been 
transmitted to primates. One particularly lurid speculation (Gajdusek 1977) 
conjectures that the agents of scrapie, kuru, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease and 
transmissible encephalopathy of mink are varieties of a single "virus". The U.S. 
Department of Agriculture concluded that it could "no longer justify or permit 
scrapie-blood line and scrapie-exposed sheep and goats to be processed for human 
or animal food at slaughter or rendering plants" (ARC 84/77)" The problem is 
emphasised by the finding that some strains of scrapie produce lesions identical 
to the once which characterise the human dementias"
Whether true or not. the hypothesis that these agents might be 
transmissible to man raises two considerations. First, the safety of laboratory 
personnel requires prompt attention. Second, action such as the "scorched meat" 
policy of USDA makes the solution of the acrapie problem urgent if the sheep 
industry is not to suffer grievously.
snip... 
76/10.12/4.6 
Nature. 1972 Mar 10;236(5341):73-4. 
Transmission of scrapie to the cynomolgus monkey (Macaca fascicularis). 
Gibbs CJ Jr, Gajdusek DC.
Nature 236, 73 - 74 (10 March 1972); doi:10.1038/236073a0
Transmission of Scrapie to the Cynomolgus Monkey (Macaca 
fascicularis)
C. J. GIBBS jun. & D. C. GAJDUSEK
National Institute of Neurological Diseases and Stroke, National Institutes 
of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
SCRAPIE has been transmitted to the cynomolgus, or crab-eating, monkey 
(Macaca fascicularis) with an incubation period of more than 5 yr from the time 
of intracerebral inoculation of scrapie-infected mouse brain. The animal 
developed a chronic central nervous system degeneration, with ataxia, tremor and 
myoclonus with associated severe scrapie-like pathology of intensive astroglial 
hypertrophy and proliferation, neuronal vacuolation and status spongiosus of 
grey matter. The strain of scrapie virus used was the eighth passage in Swiss 
mice (NIH) of a Compton strain of scrapie obtained as ninth intracerebral 
passage of the agent in goat brain, from Dr R. L. Chandler (ARC, Compton, 
Berkshire). 
IT is of my opinion, that the OIE and the USDA et al, are the soul reason, 
and responsible parties, for Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathy TSE prion 
diseases, including typical and atypical BSE, typical and atypical Scrapie, and 
all strains of CWD, and human TSE there from, spreading around the globe. 
I have lost all confidence of this organization as a regulatory authority 
on animal disease, and consider it nothing more than a National Trading 
Brokerage for all strains of animal TSE, just to satisfy there commodity. AS i 
said before, OIE should hang up there jock strap now, since it appears they will 
buckle every time a country makes some political hay about trade protocol, 
commodities and futures. IF they are not going to be science based, they should 
do everyone a favor and dissolve there organization. 
JUST because of low documented human body count with nvCJD and the long 
incubation periods, the lack of sound science being replaced by political and 
corporate science in relations with the fact that science has now linked some 
sporadic CJD with atypical BSE and atypical scrapie, and the very real threat of 
CWD being zoonosis, I believed the O.I.E. has failed terribly and again, I call 
for this organization to be dissolved. ... 
Tuesday, July 17, 2012 
O.I.E. BSE, CWD, SCRAPIE, TSE PRION DISEASE Final Report of the 80th 
General Session, 20 - 25 May 2012 
Thursday, December 20, 2012 
OIE GROUP RECOMMENDS THAT SCRAPE PRION DISEASE BE DELISTED AND SAME OLD BSe 
WITH BOVINE MAD COW DISEASE 
TSS